|
|
![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Tuesday Threats or opportunities?
Introducer Nico Schrakamp elaborated on the direct costs, caused by REACH, for especially SMEs, and introduced the British Hungarian proposal OSOR (One Substance, one registration) as a possible solution for that. Frans Tummers passionately talked about indirect costs. He questioned the use of scenario thinking, certainly when a scenario for the impact of REACH is called 'hurricane'. Hurricanes never occur in Europe... Tummers also said not to be afraid of substance withdrawal, because he doesn't expect a great number of substances to be withdrawn from the market: "That would mean we are living dangerously now!". He also claimed that companies won't wait for the legislation to be implemented, but are already looking for new solutions. It is important that SMEs receive good information fast and get full co-operation from the institutes that have to implement REACH. Tummers was brief on the subject of confidentiality: "Coca Cola has already had to register the recipe of the famous drink numerous times, but nobody has ever got hold of the information of the product. Otherwise, millions would have become very rich." On the subject 'competitiveness and innovation' the workshop came up with recommendations to a number of possible negative effects on competition and ways to avoid short-term negative effects on innovation. And finally the workshop decided the impact of society should be mentioned, even if they are wide-ranging. And when most of the participants wound down having diner in the Mauritshuis, a small group worked till late to prepare draft recommendations, which will be presented for discussion on Wednesday.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||